International Association of Internet Broadcasters - IAIB

News Updates
October 2, 2013:
Bambuser Adds Restrictions To Free Streaming
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: How do you use Skype with your broadcast?

  1. #11
    IAIB Broadcaster robistech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by mkresic View Post
    I'm a little confused about how exactly a video setup works. Maybe I'm overthinking this. For my audio podcasts today I have mix minus configured to my Skype machine. Both of my remote hosts call into this one machine. That works just fine... when Skype is not misbehaving.

    But I want to add video and use Wirecast. My thought was to have each remote host call in to a separate Skype machine and then use Desktop Presenter to capture their video to a 3rd machine running Wirecast. Similarly I could use DP to capture my screen if I wanted to show something in a browser window. But this raises several questions:

    1. Can I run the same Skype account on both Skype machines or does each Skype user have to call a different Skype account on my end

    2. What video am I sending BACK to each remote Skype user? They're already getting mix minus audio. I don't imagine I can send them any video back from my Wirecast machine. Is there a way for them to see the video I am "producing on the fly" in the studio? Or are they just staring at nothing when we are recording?

    3. Does this setup eliminate the need for video graphics cards in each machine since I am just grabbing the video with Desktop Presenter? (thinking about using a Mac Mini for each Skype host. Bad idea?)

    Has anyone produced a video walking through their video workflow? I have seen many YouTube videos showcasing some very cool studios, but none have gone into the specifics of how to do this other than at a high level.

    Thanks,
    Mike
    Great questions Mike. Here's my take:
    1. Each guest needs to call into a separate skype account.

    2. Wirecast allows a "Virtual Camera Output" essentially allowing you to easily share the program output to a Skype caller BUT it does not work when you have skype running on a seperate machine (which is actually the correct way to do this) Sending a program output feed to the Skype callers is not incredibly hard to do, but connivence, price, and quality all go hand in hand. For the cleanest return video, easiest thing to do would be to take for example the HDMI output of your Wirecast rig, send it through an HDMI splitter, and then run the split connections to their own separate inputs on each machine's HDMI capture card. I use an AverTV which works decent for the price, but you could also use a Black Magic Intensity Pro. If you want to save some $, a few years ago I showed off a much cheaper way to do skype return video. Quality isn't nearly as good, but if you just want to give each guest a live feed so they can see what's up on screen, this will work. I detailed my setup here, and feel free to ask any questions if you have any. On a sidetone, if you go with Mac Minis, PCI cards won't work. You would want to go with the Black Magic Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt Edition

    3. Desktop Presenter will work, but certainly not ideal. It's always good to try it before buying any extra equipment , but I've always run into frame rare issues and it will never be as smooth as capturing the actual output into a capture card. Again, you'd want to go with either the AverTV or BMI Pro, and put 2 of these into your Wirecast rig. Take the HDMI output of your Mac Minis and feed them into the capture cards. If budget allows, there's nothing wrong with Mac Minis, but PCs usually work just fine as Skype Machines and offer more flexibility and capture card support.

  2. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by robistech View Post
    Great questions Mike. Here's my take:
    1. Each guest needs to call into a separate skype account.

    2. Wirecast allows a "Virtual Camera Output" essentially allowing you to easily share the program output to a Skype caller BUT it does not work when you have skype running on a seperate machine (which is actually the correct way to do this) Sending a program output feed to the Skype callers is not incredibly hard to do, but connivence, price, and quality all go hand in hand. For the cleanest return video, easiest thing to do would be to take for example the HDMI output of your Wirecast rig, send it through an HDMI splitter, and then run the split connections to their own separate inputs on each machine's HDMI capture card. I use an AverTV which works decent for the price, but you could also use a Black Magic Intensity Pro. If you want to save some $, a few years ago I showed off a much cheaper way to do skype return video. Quality isn't nearly as good, but if you just want to give each guest a live feed so they can see what's up on screen, this will work. I detailed my setup here, and feel free to ask any questions if you have any. On a sidetone, if you go with Mac Minis, PCI cards won't work. You would want to go with the Black Magic Intensity Shuttle Thunderbolt Edition

    3. Desktop Presenter will work, but certainly not ideal. It's always good to try it before buying any extra equipment , but I've always run into frame rare issues and it will never be as smooth as capturing the actual output into a capture card. Again, you'd want to go with either the AverTV or BMI Pro, and put 2 of these into your Wirecast rig. Take the HDMI output of your Mac Minis and feed them into the capture cards. If budget allows, there's nothing wrong with Mac Minis, but PCs usually work just fine as Skype Machines and offer more flexibility and capture card support.

    Robistech-

    Thank you for that information. I appreciate the time you took to address each of my questions. And you really helped me understand the need for the capture cards in the machines. I have to admit I did not understand why they were necessary at all if Desktop Presenter was available. But I had also worried about audio sync issues with that approach and your comments suggest there may be a reason to be concerned about that. I'll have to look into all of those card options you mentioned.

    I'm pretty much a Mac setup today but certainly not averse to picking up a few cheap Windows boxes. That certainly would provide more options that going the external route like the Intensity Shuttle which a Mac Mini would force me to do.

    Much appreciate your help! It's so cool to have a forum like this. I'd done countless searches for info or videos and you basically answered all of my questions within an hour of my post. Amazing.

    Mike

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
© International Association of Internet Broadcasters All Rights Reserved.
Follow Us