Quote Originally Posted by BradShoemaker View Post
It depends on what you are trying to do. I have Amazon S3 linked into my sites to serve the audio. I use YouTube (currently) for videos, but audio is served via S3. My audio files are between 80-120MB. It takes a load off of my traditional server which charges more for storage than Amazon S3 does. So if you just want to store audio for backup, maybe not for you, but if you want to serve audio and video...while using it as your backup, it works very well and the cost is worth it.
I pretty much do the same - serve up the audio via S3/CloudFront. That way it serves two purposes.