The news are that I've been banned in Vidblaster forum with no reason specified. Of course I know the "secret" reason, I just wrote that IN MY OPINION, Wirecast is better than Vidblaster.
I'm on Team Telestream on this one
Wirecast has WAY more compositing power than VidBlaster ever has (3D positioning is one that Spino has already pointed out). I also love the power that CoreImage gives it on the Macintosh version. Also I've never once seen someone be able to do proper lower thirds with VidBlaster? What's the issue?
Also the fact that VidBlaster seems to choke on any thing higher than 640x480 is very off-putting. I want to do full 720P video and Wirecast lets me do it with little resources.
I would like to express my opinion on this matter.
Tom is a guy that's on the up and up. Even thought he is a Vidblaster Reseller and Mod on the forum He is not a cheerleader by any means.
Lets put an end to the hostility. Its one thing to express your opinion and its another to start attacking fellow IAIB Members
Last edited by andrewzarian; 09-15-2012 at 10:23 AM.
I never attacked Tom, I respect him but probably I wasn't the target of your post.Originally Posted by andrewzarian
Telestream seems to take a different approach on their forum.
Often times people talk about competing products and why they like them.
There's people who have said why they like VidBlaster, XSplit, Tricaster, interested in Livestream HD500, Blackmagic ATEM.
Telesteam's approach is that this allows them to see how people who have used Wirecast and compared it to other products feel about things. Then Telestream looks at how they can improve Wirecast.
One could say, rather than viewing commentary on other products as hostile, i suspect they see it as sort of a focus group.
In fact, seeing a number of posts explaining why people liked VidBlaster's Virtual Device out might have helped Telestream see the importance of the feature.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks