International Association of Internet Broadcasters - IAIB

News Updates
October 2, 2013:
Bambuser Adds Restrictions To Free Streaming

View Poll Results: Vidblaster Vs. Wirecast

Voters
63. You may not vote on this poll
  • Vidblaster

    22 34.92%
  • Wirecast

    39 61.90%
  • Other

    2 3.17%
Results 1 to 10 of 118

Thread: Vidblaster Vs Wirecast

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Senior Member cseeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    332
    I can see that VidBlaster had a strong feature set that Wirecast didn't support for some time.
    VB had virtual camera out and live thumbnails for a long time before Wirecast.
    Wirecast's live thumbnails allow control of the frame rate or can be disable to lower CPU use.
    Wirecast is adding RTMPT/RTSP/MMS/HTTP support through its WebStream plugin in Wirecast 5.
    VidBlaster's Advanced Chroma is very good and replay is also a nice feature.
    Telestream may be slower to add those features but they're also working cross platform.

    Regarding company resources, Wirecast was originally just a couple of guys with a small company Varasoft. Telestream bought them and added supporting resources so the coders could focus on just that rather than running every aspect of a company. In those early days Wirecast was Mac only and Quicktime only (no Flash). Telestream is the key reason for Wirecast's feature growth.

    While Mike V has done a lot on his own perhaps it's time that he consider going the Varasoft route and look for a buyer to expand the company. At the very least CombiTech may need partners to grow. He may need to consider hiring support staff.
    Last edited by cseeman; 09-24-2013 at 01:01 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
© International Association of Internet Broadcasters All Rights Reserved.
Follow Us