International Association of Internet Broadcasters - IAIB

News Updates
October 2, 2013:
Bambuser Adds Restrictions To Free Streaming
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Misinformation about Podcasting

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Senior Member Podnutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    359

    Lightbulb Misinformation about Podcasting

    I have been doing a lot of reading over the past few months about what you should and shouldn't do in your podcasting.

    Here is an example

    Dynamic microphone Vs. Condenser Microphone - When I first went to go and buy a microphone everyone told me Condensers sound better.

    What is some misinformation that you have seen?

  2. #2
    Moderator / IAIB Pro Broadcaster mcphillips's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    599
    If you have an acoustically treated studio, you can use either one. If you don't have an acoustically treated room, get a dynamic mic. It doesn't pick up nearly as much background noise.
    Please direct all questions for me to the forum so that all can benefit.

  3. #3
    IAIB Pro Broadcaster techzentv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    185
    Well, this is not as much a mis-information as people very opinionated. There seems to be a battle between some about what is better, an audio or video podcast. Personally I do not think this warrants any kind of argument, do whatever works best for you and your listeners / viewers.
    Last edited by techzentv; 08-23-2013 at 10:05 AM.

  4. #4
    IAIB Pro Broadcaster techzentv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    185
    Oh, here is another good one... Podcasting is easy and you can get rich doing it. For the most part, that is mis-information.

  5. #5
    Member Brutish Sailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by techzentv View Post
    Oh, here is another good one... Podcasting is easy and you can get rich doing it. For the most part, that is mis-information.
    Yep, that goes for double for streaming. I broke 1000 TLH mid month, and my total so far this year is: - $400 for bandwidth and JLA licensing (coverage for BMI, ASCAP, SESAC, AND SX)

    Theirs some ways to recoup money, but your going to spend more time chasing it than doing a show. Not to mention if your a fan of your own media (you put yourself in your listeners shoes) it becomes even harder to dilute your show with ads. Some are sneaky enough to pull it off.

  6. #6
    Senior Member oscarmartz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Corona NY
    Posts
    208
    Money can not be made from affiliate programs. I have been doing amazon and godaddy and made around 300 bucks last month. not bad for someone who has very few listeners
    you best get steppin

  7. #7
    Senior Member cseeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    332
    Quote Originally Posted by Podnutter View Post
    I have been doing a lot of reading over the past few months about what you should and shouldn't do in your podcasting.

    Here is an example

    Dynamic microphone Vs. Condenser Microphone - When I first went to go and buy a microphone everyone told me Condensers sound better.

    What is some misinformation that you have seen?
    I think this kind of stuff happens when people follow a "convention" without explanation.
    As others mentioned, people are opinionated. The problem is people don't express how they've arrived at their opinion.
    Condensors are common in radio and are often used in acoustically treated spaces.
    Many of us who podcast and/or live stream aren't in a position to do that. A dynamic mic, specifically cardioid would be preferable because they can reject sound from an environment that may have issues.
    Unfortunately (and in my opinion) a lot of people use condensers since they see "the pros" doing that in studio. There are people who recommend condensers without any explanation why. The why may or may not be relevant but the reader has no way to discern that, if it's not offered. Maybe it's better to describe that as incomplete information.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
© International Association of Internet Broadcasters All Rights Reserved.
Follow Us